Drawing for CFC

USPTO serial 79116681

CFC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MITTLER, ROBIN M
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CFC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Stickers of all kinds; packaging of cardboard, packaging materials made of plastic, printed matterSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
017Plastic films for styling or finishing surfaces of glass, metal and plastic, in particular climate, sunscreen, tinted, design, protective and security films for the interiors and exteriors of vehicles of all kindsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
035Advertising agency servicesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 27, 2022DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Nov 26, 2022DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 16, 2014FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 25, 2014FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 25, 2014FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 28, 2014OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 12, 2014OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 12, 2014OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 25, 2013MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 25, 2013ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 17, 2012RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 21, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 21, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 21, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 20, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 15, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 11, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 11, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 7, 2012REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance