USPTO serial 79116701
NETCOMMWIRELESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4452863Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 24, 2013
- Examiner
- BIDDULPH, HEATHER ANN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NETCOMMWIRELESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven C. Sereboff
Steven C. Sereboff SoCal IP Law Group LLP310 N. Westlake Blvd., Suite 120Westlake Village, CA 91362UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Aerials for telecommunications; computer controlled telecommunications exchange apparatus; computer programs for providing integrated telephone communication with computerized global information networks, and for providing sound, images, documents, emails, voice messages and text messages on computerized global information networks, all for use in telecommunications; high capacity broadband telecommunications switching apparatus; insulated telecommunications cables; telecommunications apparatus, namely, antennas for wireless communications apparatus; telecommunications apparatus for transmitting data for use with computers; telecommunications apparatus for use in cellular radio networks, namely, modems and network routers for fixed wireless mobile multimedia and communication devices; telecommunications apparatus for use with analogue signals, namely, digital and analogue signal transmitters, receivers and converters, wireless routers and modems; telecommunications apparatus for use with digital signals, namely, digital and analogue signal transmitters, receivers and converters, wireless routers and modems; telecommunications cable; telecommunications circuit board units; routers, namely, network routers; modems | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Netcomm Wireless Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Netcomm Wireless Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Netcomm Wireless Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named NETCOMMWIRELESS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 2022 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2022 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 7, 2022 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Feb 18, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2022 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Dec 22, 2021 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 22, 2021 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 26, 2021 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 26, 2021 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Dec 24, 2018 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2014 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 19, 2014 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 19, 2014 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 24, 2014 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 24, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 8, 2013 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 8, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 18, 2013 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2013 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 2, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 9, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 2, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 17, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 17, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 17, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 10, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 16, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 8, 2012 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2012 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2012 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 15, 2012 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 15, 2012 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 11, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2012 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |