USPTO serial 79116874
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Cuff links, tie clips, rings, bracelets, earrings, necklaces, brooches, key rings, watches, chronometers, clocks, watchbands, boxes of precious metal for watches and jewelry | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Presentation of goods on all communication media for retail sale of the following goods, jewelry, works of art, timepieces, watches, precious stones, precious metals; public relations; advertising services for luxury goods, namely, jewelry, works of art, timepieces, watches, precious stones, precious metals; business management and organization consultancy in the field of luxury goods; sales promotion in connection with jewelry, precious stones, works of art, collection items | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 2014 | IRFI | IRREGULARITY ON FINAL DECISION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 22, 2014 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 22, 2014 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 22, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 22, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 6, 2013 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 1, 2013 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 13, 2012 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 13, 2012 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 12, 2012 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 11, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 2012 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2012 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |