Drawing for VFA

USPTO serial 79117000

VFA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUTTON, JENNIFER JO
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VFA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Computer programming; computer systems analysis; installation of computer software; updating of computer software; maintenance of computer software; duplication of computer programs; computer software design; computer system design; consultancy in the field of computer software; updating of computer software; creating and maintaining web sites for others; conversion of data or documents from physical to electronic media; data conversion of computer programs and data not physical conversion; technical research; quality control; technical project studies; urban planning; engineering; technical project studies; engineering drawing; machinery research; consultation in energy saving; packaging design; consultation in environment protection; industrial design; research and development for others; styling industrial design; quality testing; quality evaluationSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 20, 2013DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 6, 2013MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 6, 2013ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 6, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 1, 2012RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 5, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 5, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 5, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 4, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 18, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 14, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 13, 2012REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance