USPTO serial 79117251
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey H. Greger
Jeffrey H. Greger Lowe Hauptman Ham & Berner, LLP2318 Mill RoadSuite 1400Alexandria, VA 22314| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machine tools, namely, laser cutters, water-jet cutters, blade cutters, rotary blade cutters, ultrasound cutters, quilting machines, conveyors, machines for handling cut parts of fabric or flexible materials, assembly machines for assembling fabric or flexible materials in successive stages, sewing machines, labelers in the nature of electronic label printing machines for commercial use, machines for spreading fabric on a table, packaging and dispatch machines used for dispatching fabric or flexible materials, for the textile, clothing, footwear, garment, luggage, furnishing, leather goods, automobile, navigation, aeronautics and technical fabrics industries | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 10, 2022 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2022 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 29, 2022 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Dec 30, 2021 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 30, 2021 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 26, 2021 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 26, 2021 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jul 27, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2014 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 18, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 18, 2013 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 17, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 17, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 21, 2013 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 2, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 19, 2013 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 19, 2013 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 12, 2013 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 24, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 21, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 1, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 9, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 25, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 17, 2012 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 26, 2012 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 26, 2012 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 26, 2012 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 26, 2012 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2012 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2012 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |