Drawing for FLOGRADE

USPTO serial 79117511

FLOGRADE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4420259Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 22, 2013
Examiner
GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with FLOGRADE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Janet G Ricciuti

Janet G Ricciuti JANET GILBERT RICCIUTI, PC2003 Kalorama Road NWWashington, DC 20009UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001[ Chemicals for industrial purposes; ] chemicals for use in the mining and hydrometallurgical industries, namely, unprocessed polymers, flocculants, coagulants, dispersants for treating tailings, slurries, metal waste powder; chemicals for industrial use, namely, flocculating and coagulation agents for use in mining operations, [ paper manufacturing; chemicals for industrial use, namely, flocculating and coagulation agents for use in water and effluents treatment; chemicals for industrial use, namely, flocculating and coagulation agents for use in water and solid separation; chemicals, namely, unprocessed polymers, flocculants, coagulants, ] dispersants for use in the process of crushing and grinding ores; [ chemical agents, namely, unprocessed polymers, flocculants, coagulants and dispersants to prevent the accumulation of foam and bubbles at the surface of a liquid; rheology modifying agents, namely, chemical agents to modify the viscosity of a liquid; chemical preparations in the nature of filtering agents in the seawater desalination industry; ] chemicals, namely, organic dispersant to prevent scale deposits of inorganic materials; Chemical leaching agents for filtering liquids from solids in the mining industries and hydrometallurgical industries; chemicals, namely, unprocessed polymers, flocculants, coagulants and dispersants to control the volatility of powders in the mining industry and on building sitesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 14, 2025INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
Jan 29, 2025INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
May 29, 2024NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
May 29, 202471AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
May 28, 2024APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 2, 2023ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Apr 10, 2023ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Oct 22, 2022REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jun 23, 2022RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jun 19, 2021ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Sep 25, 2020INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Aug 13, 2020INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Aug 13, 2020INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jul 4, 2020INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Nov 4, 2019NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Nov 4, 201971AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Nov 4, 2019APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 8, 2019ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Oct 22, 2018REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Feb 28, 2014FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 23, 2014FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 23, 2014FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jan 22, 2014FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 22, 2013R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 6, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 6, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 17, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 1, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 28, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 13, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 14, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 14, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 14, 2013ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Mar 27, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 25, 2013GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 25, 2013GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 25, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 22, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 22, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 22, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 19, 2012RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 16, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 16, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 16, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 15, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 4, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 30, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 30, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 27, 2012REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance