Drawing for UBER PROFESSIONAL NUTRIENT SOLUTIONS

USPTO serial 79117631

UBER PROFESSIONAL NUTRIENT SOLUTIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4427045Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 5, 2013
Examiner
FARRELL, ANNE M
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with UBER PROFESSIONAL NUTRIENT SOLUTIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jay M. Schloff

Jay M. Schloff Aidenbaum Schloff and Bloom PLLC6960 Orchard Lake Road, Suite 250West Bloomfield, MI 48322UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemical additives for fertilisers; fertilisers; fertilisers consisting of compounds of nitrogen; liquid fertilisers; mulch for soil enrichment used as a fertiliser; nitrogenous fertilisersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 3, 2022DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Sep 3, 2022DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 29, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jan 3, 2022INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jan 3, 2022INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 26, 2021INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 26, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Nov 5, 2018REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Feb 21, 2014FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 5, 2014FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 5, 2014FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Feb 5, 2014FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 5, 2013R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 20, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 20, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 31, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 17, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 17, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 15, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 15, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 8, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 18, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 7, 2013NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jun 7, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 7, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 7, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 7, 2013PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 7, 2013PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 9, 2013MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 9, 2013ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 6, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 6, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 1, 2012RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 10, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 10, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 10, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 9, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 5, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 1, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 1, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 28, 2012REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance