Drawing for MAXIMA

USPTO serial 79117669

MAXIMA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FOSDICK, GEOFFREY A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 100 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MAXIMA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Industrial machinery, namely, electromechanical machines for preparing beverages and liquid food; aerated and non-aerated beverage making machines used for preparing carbonated waters, soda water, water and beverages; Industrial machinery, namely, electromechanical machines for preparing instant foodABANDONED—
011Electromechanical espresso machines, electrical coffee machines; apparatus for water treatment, namely, apparatus for water filtering in particular water filter pitchers; apparatus for water preparation, apparatus for water sterilization, namely, water filters and water filter cartridges for water filter pitchers; replacement parts for the aforementioned goodsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 27, 2022DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Dec 26, 2022DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 8, 2017CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 22, 2016FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 1, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 1, 2016FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 2, 2015PC.DPETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED—
Jul 1, 2015MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jul 1, 2015ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jul 1, 2015OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jul 1, 2015OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Jun 15, 2015APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
May 7, 2015TPDRTEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—
Apr 28, 2015PCDEPETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED—
Feb 5, 2015TPDRTEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—
Feb 2, 2015APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Jan 7, 2015TPDRTEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—
Dec 18, 2014PCDEPETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED—
Sep 3, 2014ERTITEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION INQUIRY LETTER—
Aug 13, 2014PILMPETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED—
Aug 7, 2014APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Jan 7, 2014PCRCPETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—
Aug 4, 2013RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 14, 2013GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 13, 2013OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jul 11, 2013OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB—
Jul 11, 2013OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED—
Jul 9, 2013MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 12, 2013ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 14, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 24, 2013OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 24, 2013OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 24, 2013NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 11, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 5, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 4, 2013ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 4, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 4, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 2, 2013MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 1, 2012RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 9, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 9, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 9, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 8, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 5, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 1, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 1, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 28, 2012REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance