Drawing for BUG OFF

USPTO serial 79117899

BUG OFF

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BLAIR, JASON
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BUG OFF?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Soaps, perfumery, essential oils, cosmetics, hair lotions, sunblock lotions, skin care productsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
005Preparations for destroying and repelling verminSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 28, 2022DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Aug 27, 2022DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
May 8, 2014FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 18, 2014FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Apr 18, 2014FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 21, 2014OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 5, 2014OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Mar 5, 2014OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 18, 2013MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 18, 2013ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 16, 2012RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 15, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Oct 15, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Oct 13, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Oct 12, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Oct 11, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 9, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 9, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Oct 4, 2012REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance