USPTO serial 79118247
PROTKEEP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MURRAY, DAVID T
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 100 - MANAGING ATTORNEY
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PROTKEEP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHRISTOPHER S. ADKINS
CHRISTOPHER S. ADKINS WENDEROTH, LIND & PONACK, L.L.P.1030 15TH STREET NWSUITE 400 EASTWASHINGTON, DC 20005Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemical agents for use in metal surface film formation for reducing lixiviation of metal component; metal surface film formation agent for lixiviation reduction of cadmium, copper, or zinc, etc; chemicals; adhesives not for stationery or household purposes; higher fatty acids; nonferrous metals including antimony, silicon (metal element), cerium, and tellurium; non-metallic minerals; unprocessed plastics plastics in primary form | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 006 | Iron and steel; nonferrous metals and their alloys; metal materials for building or construction; metal pulleys, springs and valves not including machine elements; metal junctions for pipes; metal flanges; metal hardware; industrial packaging containers of metal | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | Metal surface film formation treatment for anti-rust or polishing; metal surface film formation treatment for lixiviation reduction of cadmium, copper, or zinc, etc; treatment of metal; ceramic processing; water treating; recycling of waste; rental of metal treating machines and tools; rental of chemical processing machines and apparatus | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2022 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Sep 4, 2022 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2022 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 1, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2014 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 15, 2014 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 15, 2014 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 14, 2014 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Mar 28, 2014 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 12, 2014 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 12, 2014 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 10, 2014 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 25, 2014 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 15, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 26, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 26, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2012 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 17, 2012 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 17, 2012 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 17, 2012 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 16, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2012 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 12, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2012 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |