Drawing for ITB CONSULT

USPTO serial 79118298

ITB CONSULT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
FLOWERS, JAY K
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ITB CONSULT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business management and organisation consultancySECTION 70 - CANCELLED
042Consultancy in the field of information technologySECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 14, 2023UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN
Jan 24, 2023DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Jan 23, 2023DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jun 6, 2014FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
May 22, 2014FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
May 22, 2014FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 28, 2014OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 12, 2014OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Mar 12, 2014OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 22, 2013MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 22, 2013ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 15, 2012RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 24, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Oct 24, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Oct 24, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Oct 23, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 23, 2012RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW
Oct 23, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Oct 22, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 22, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 19, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Oct 15, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Oct 11, 2012REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance