USPTO serial 79118433
CHÂTEAU DE BERNE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4416397Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 15, 2013
- Examiner
- FAIRBANKS, RONALD L
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CHÂTEAU DE BERNE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nicholas D. Wells
Nicholas D. Wells Legends Law Group330 N. Main St.Kaysville, UT 84037UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Wines with the protected appellation of origin Côtes de Provence * exclusively from the wine-making estate called Château de Berne in Provence * | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Providing of training and education in the fields of culinary art and enology; arranging and conducting training workshops in the fields of culinary art and enology; cookery classes; tasting classes; enology classes; publication of books, magazines, periodicals, especially in the field of culinary art and enology; electronic publication of magazines, periodicals, especially in the field of culinary art and enology; arranging and conducting educational congresses, conferences and colloquiums; arranging entertainment and shows, namely, entertainment exhibitions in the nature of wine festivals; organization of exhibitions for cultural or educational purposes; arranging sports events and activities; providing a fitness facility featuring body building equipment and installations | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 043 | Hotel services; services for providing food and drink; bar services; food and drink catering; catering services, namely, arranging buffets, meals and cocktails in the context of ceremonies and receptions; rental of meeting rooms, tents, chairs, tables, table linen and glassware; advice and information in relation to cooking, gastronomy and enology | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MDCV
- Other trademarks owned by BERNE SELECTION, Sarl
- Other trademarks owned by BERNE SELECTION, Sarl
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named CHÂTEAU DE BERNE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2023 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2023 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 5, 2022 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2022 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2022 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 26, 2021 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 26, 2021 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Mar 19, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2019 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Oct 15, 2018 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2015 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 2014 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 21, 2014 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 16, 2014 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 16, 2014 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 16, 2014 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 16, 2014 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 16, 2014 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED | — |
| Jan 15, 2014 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 8, 2013 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 15, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 30, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 10, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 26, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 11, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 21, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 21, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 8, 2013 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 7, 2013 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 7, 2013 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 3, 2013 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 2, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 19, 2012 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2012 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |