Drawing for DYNAVOLT

USPTO serial 79118652

DYNAVOLT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
FLETCHER, TRACY L
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DYNAVOLT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Batteries, electric, for vehicles; battery boxes; batteries for lighting; chargers for electric batteries; galvanic cells; grids for batteries; batteries for pocketlamps; batteries, electric; accumulators, electric; cathodic anti-corrosion apparatusSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 21, 2023DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Feb 20, 2023DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Apr 22, 2022ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Apr 2, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Nov 1, 2018ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Nov 7, 2015ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Jul 24, 2014FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 9, 2014FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jul 9, 2014FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 3, 2014OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 19, 2014OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Mar 19, 2014OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jul 9, 2013MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 9, 2013ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 1, 2013RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 11, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Dec 11, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Dec 9, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Dec 8, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 30, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 30, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Oct 24, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Oct 23, 2012REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance