Drawing for UNIWAL

USPTO serial 79118740

UNIWAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RINKER, ANTHONY MICHAEL
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with UNIWAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
027Wallpaper namely textile lined wallpaper in the nature of roomsize decorative adhesive wall coverings; non-textile wall hangings; tapestry-style wall hangings, not of textile; mats namely door mats, floor mats, bath mats; carpets; non-slip mats for door mats; floor mats; bath mats; synthetic grass (artificial turf); carpets for automobilesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 17, 2022DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Oct 16, 2022DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 19, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 20, 2014FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 4, 2014FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 4, 2014FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 3, 2014OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 19, 2014OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 19, 2014OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 4, 2013MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 4, 2013ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 26, 2012RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 6, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 6, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 3, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 2, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 30, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 26, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 26, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 24, 2012LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 23, 2012REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance