Drawing for CHERRY

USPTO serial 79119027

CHERRY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4456958Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 31, 2013
Examiner
BRECKENFELD, WILLIAM G
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with CHERRY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mari-Elise Paul

Mari-Elise Paul McBrayer PLLC500 West Jefferson Street, Suite 2400Louisville, KY 40202United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer input devices, computer mice, computer keyboards, electronic card readers [, electrical switches, namely, snap switches, push button switches, sliding contact switches, rocker switches, selector switches ] ; key modules, namely, mechanical input keys for keyboards and keypads [ ; electronic controls, namely, range top controls, cooking oven controls; wireless remote electrical switches, electrical transmission sensors, power electronics, namely, transformers, converters and inverters for hybrid powertrain systems; sensors, namely, magnetic and hall effect position sensors, magnetically activated vane sensors, hall effect gear tooth sensors for speed and direction measurement, hall effect and magnetic angular position sensors for motors and transmissions, user interface controls, pedals, gear selectors, and joysticks, door contact sensors ]ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 27, 2025INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jun 7, 2025INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jun 7, 2025INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Mar 17, 2025INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Dec 6, 2024ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jul 17, 2024NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jul 17, 202471AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jul 5, 2024EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Apr 9, 2024TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 9, 2024ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
Apr 9, 2024ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 9, 2024REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 4, 2024PUM1OFFICE ACTION ISSUED POU1—
Jan 3, 2024APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 23, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 21, 2023ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Dec 31, 2022REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Nov 3, 2022RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Nov 26, 2021ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jun 10, 2020NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jun 10, 2020C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jun 9, 2020EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Feb 7, 2020PR75POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15—
Feb 5, 2020APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 18, 2019ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Dec 31, 2018REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Apr 5, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 15, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 16, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 27, 2016CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 6, 2014FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 21, 2014FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 21, 2014FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 31, 2014FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 31, 2013R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 15, 2013GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 15, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 15, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 25, 2013OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 25, 2013OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 25, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 7, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 5, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 7, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 7, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 31, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 26, 2013NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jul 25, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 25, 2013PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 25, 2013PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jul 25, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 16, 2013MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 15, 2013ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 8, 2013RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 17, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 17, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 16, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 15, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 11, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 6, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 31, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 26, 2012REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance