USPTO serial 79119103
Serial No. 79119103
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- IMAM, AMEEN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 79119103?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David A.W. Wong
David A.W. Wong Barnes & Thornburg LLP11 S. Meridian St.Indianapolis, IN 46204UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Skin care preparations in the nature of non-medicated skin care preparations, perfumes, soaps, shampoos, cosmetics, non-medicated toilet preparations namely, toilet soaps, toilet waters, cleansing milk for toilet purposes, facial packs for toilet purposes, oil for toilet purposes, toilet powders; hair colourants, hair conditioners, hair dyes, hair lotions or hair styling preparations; deodorants for personal use; depilatories; anti-perspirant preparations non-medicated talcum powder for toilet purposes; sun-tanning preparations (cosmetics); non-medicated massage preparations in the nature of massage oils, massage waxes, massage creams, massage lotions, massage gels; bath additives namely, bath beads, bath foams, bath gels, bath salts, bubble bath, bath oils, bath crystals, bath bombs, bath herbs, bath mousse not for medical purposes; shaving preparations; dentifrices; essential oils; beauty masks, facial packs in the nature of facial beauty masks, nail care preparations, nail varnish; pumice stone and cotton sticks for cosmetic purposes; cotton wool for non-medical purposes; scented articles for perfumery purposes in the nature of scented body spray, scented body lotions and creams, scented oils, scented toilet waters, pot pourri for room fragrance purposes, powder impregnated paper for cosmetic purposes, namely, paper hand towels impregnated with cosmetics, abrasive boards for use on fingernails, abrasive pumice stone for use on the body, abrasive granules for use on the body; all included in this class | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 7, 2015 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 5, 2014 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 21, 2014 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 21, 2014 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2014 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 26, 2014 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 26, 2014 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 21, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 21, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 28, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 23, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 2, 2013 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 2, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 17, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 26, 2012 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 6, 2012 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 6, 2012 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2012 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 4, 2012 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 3, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 1, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2012 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |