Drawing for DBEST

USPTO serial 79119161

DBEST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ORNDORFF, LINDA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DBEST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Telephones; mobile phones; cell telephones; cordless telephones; satellite telephones; portable communication devices; computer apparatus and instalments; electrical and electronic apparatus and instruments for the reproduction of sound or images; parts and accessories for all the aforesaid goods; all included in class 09SECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 22, 2023UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Feb 20, 2023DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Feb 19, 2023DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 31, 2014FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 14, 2014FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 12, 2014FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 10, 2014OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 26, 2014OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 26, 2014OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 12, 2013MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 12, 2013ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 23, 2012RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 4, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 4, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 4, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 3, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 29, 2012RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW—
Nov 29, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 28, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 20, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 6, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 1, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 27, 2012REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance