USPTO serial 79119172
INJEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EISNACH, MICHAEL PATRICK
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INJEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stewart J Bellus
STEWART J BELLUS COLLARD & ROE PC1077 NORTHERN BLVDROSLYN, NY 11576UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Needle-free injection system comprising needle-free injector sold empty for use in releasing medical drugs via disposable needle-free ampoules for medical drug storage and release, and accessories therefore, namely, dosing aids in the nature of a transporter into which medical drugs cartridges can be fixed, in order to allow a dose-accurate transfer of medical drugs to the empty ampoules, reset box, transporters, adapters for different drug containers; medical apparatus and instruments for the needle-free hypodermic application of topical or parenteral medical drugs sold empty; needle-free medical drug delivery system, namely, needle-free injectors sold empty for medical drugs administered either subcutaneously, intramuscularly or intradermally, disposable needle-free ampoules sold empty, storage and carrying bags and boxes and carrying cases for needle-free injectors; medical fluid transfer couplers and accessories therefore, namely vial adapters, pen adapters, transporter adapters, and luer adapters | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2023 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2023 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 18, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2016 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 16, 2016 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 16, 2016 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 16, 2015 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 13, 2015 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 13, 2015 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 22, 2014 | EXAR | EXPARTE APPEAL AFFIRMED/REVERSED IN PART | — |
| Oct 14, 2014 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Sep 22, 2014 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2014 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 24, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 23, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 18, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 15, 2014 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2014 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 10, 2014 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 5, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2014 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 28, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 28, 2014 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 26, 2014 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 26, 2014 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 30, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 30, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 6, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 6, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 2013 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 27, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 27, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 27, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 1, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 15, 2012 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 28, 2012 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 28, 2012 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 28, 2012 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 27, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 6, 2012 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2012 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |