USPTO serial 79119468
SEVAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 10, 2014
- Examiner
- LAM, HAI-LY HUYNH
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SEVAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
"Sevan" Hanqayin Jreri Gortsaran LLC
AM
Other trademarks owned by "Sevan" Hanqayin Jreri Gortsaran LLC
"Sevan" Hanqayin Jreri Gortsaran LLC
AM
Other trademarks owned by "Sevan" Hanqayin Jreri Gortsaran LLC
"Sevan" Hanqayin Jreri Gortsaran LLC
Gavar, AM
Other trademarks owned by "Sevan" Hanqayin Jreri Gortsaran LLC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NICHOLAS D WELLS
NICHOLAS D WELLS LEGENDS LAW GROUP PLLC330 NORTH MAIN STREETKAYSVILLE, UT 84037UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | [ Beers; ] mineral and aerated waters and other non-alcoholic beverages, namely, soft drinks, lemonades [ ; fruit beverages and fruit juices; syrups and other preparations for making beverages, namely, soft drinks, fruit drinks, lemonades ] | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by "Sevan" Hanqayin Jreri Gortsaran LLC
- Other trademarks owned by "Sevan" Hanqayin Jreri Gortsaran LLC
- Other trademarks owned by "Sevan" Hanqayin Jreri Gortsaran LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named SEVAN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6, 2022 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Oct 18, 2022 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 18, 2022 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 6, 2022 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Aug 27, 2022 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 27, 2021 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Dec 27, 2021 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 28, 2021 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 29, 2021 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 16, 2021 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 25, 2021 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 25, 2021 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 24, 2021 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 24, 2020 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2020 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 20, 2020 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2020 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| May 25, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 29, 2020 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2019 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2014 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 29, 2014 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 29, 2014 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 10, 2014 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2014 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 17, 2014 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 2, 2014 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 2, 2014 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 25, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 21, 2014 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 5, 2014 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 5, 2014 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 5, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 13, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 7, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 7, 2014 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2014 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 2, 2013 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 15, 2013 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2013 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 5, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 12, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 8, 2013 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 14, 2013 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 14, 2013 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 10, 2013 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 9, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 13, 2012 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2012 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |