Drawing for BBQ GREAT TASTE, EAT FRESH

USPTO serial 79119548

BBQ GREAT TASTE, EAT FRESH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4405197Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 24, 2013
Examiner
LAM, HAI-LY HUYNH
Law office
—

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BBQ GREAT TASTE, EAT FRESH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Susan B. Meyer

Susan B. Meyer Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani101 West Broadway, Suite 2000San Diego, CA 92101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029[Chicken; processed chicken product, namely, seasoned spicy chicken, chicken nuggets, chicken croquettes; vegetable salads; pickled radish]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
043Cafes; chicken restaurants; chain restaurant services featuring chickenSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 23, 2023DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jan 23, 2023DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 24, 2022REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jun 10, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 4, 2020INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Aug 5, 2020INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Aug 5, 2020INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jul 6, 2020INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Nov 6, 2019NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Nov 6, 2019C75PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Nov 1, 2019APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 1, 2019ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Sep 24, 2018REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jul 28, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 11, 2014FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 26, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 26, 2013FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Dec 24, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 24, 2013R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 1, 2013GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 9, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 9, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 19, 2013OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 19, 2013OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 19, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 31, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 30, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 15, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 15, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 15, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 15, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 15, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 15, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 3, 2012RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 15, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 15, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 14, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 13, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 13, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 7, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 7, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 2, 2012REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance