USPTO serial 79119709
SAKURAMASAMUNE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4427074Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 5, 2013
- Examiner
- HOFFMAN, DAVID AARON
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SAKURAMASAMUNE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frank J. Jordan
Frank J. Jordan Jordan and Koda, PLLC230 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10169UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Japanese liquors, namely, distilled spirits of rice (Awamori); imitation sake; Japanese white liquor (Shochu); Japanese sweet rice-based mixed liquor (Shiro-zake); sake; Japanese regenerated liquors (Naoshi); Japanese shochu-based mixed liquor (Mirin); Western liquors, namely, whiskey; vodka; gin; brandy; rum; liqueurs; alcoholic beverages of fruit, namely, strawberry wine; Perry; wine; hard cider; Japanese shochu-based beverages (Chuhai); Chinese liquors, namely, Chinese mixed liquor (Wujiapie-jiou); Chinese spirit of sorghum (Gaolian-jiou); Chinese white liquor (Baiganr); Chinese brewed liquor (Laojiou); flavored tonic liquors, namely, tonic liquor flavored with Japanese plum extracts (Umeshu); hydromel (mead); tonic liquor containing herb extracts (Homeishu); tonic liquor flavored with pine needle extracts (Matsuba-zake); tonic liquor containing mamushi-snake extracts (Mamushi-zake) | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2022 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Dec 12, 2021 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Nov 16, 2021 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 15, 2021 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 26, 2021 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 27, 2021 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 26, 2021 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| May 15, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 5, 2018 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 4, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2014 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Mar 20, 2014 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2014 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2014 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2014 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 5, 2014 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 5, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 20, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 31, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 15, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 15, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 8, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 18, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 18, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2013 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2013 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 14, 2013 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 13, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 13, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2013 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2013 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 11, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 11, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2013 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 9, 2013 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 9, 2013 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 29, 2012 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 28, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 20, 2012 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2012 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |