Drawing for AGRI INTELLIGENCE II

USPTO serial 79119713

AGRI INTELLIGENCE II

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WILLIS, PAMELA Y
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AGRI INTELLIGENCE II?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven M. Espenshade

LOUIS T PIRKEY PIRKERY BARBER PLLC600 CONGRESS AVENUESUITE 2120AUSTIN, TX 78701

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business advisory services; compilation of business information; provision of advice relating to business planning and organization; purchase of sustainable agricultural goods on behalf of businesses; marketing services; administration services in relation to sales; business administration services; dissemination of advertising materials; business support services, namely, consultancy and agronomy services provided to the farming industry; crop marketing; research into farming and rural markets; information, advisory and consultancy services relating to all of the aforementioned servicesABANDONED—
036Real estate management services relating to agriculture; real estate management of land; information, advisory and consultancy services relating to all of the aforementioned servicesABANDONED—
042Scientific and technological services, namely, research and design in the field of agronomy and sustainable management; biotechnical research relating to agriculture; analysis and research services in the field of agronomy; scientific studies in the field of agronomy and sustainable management; advisory and information services in the field of environmental research and agricultural research; advisory and consultancy services relating to all of the aforementioned servicesABANDONED—
044Agricultural, horticultural and forestry services, namely, the provision of agronomy services and sustainable farming solutions; farming services; provision of information and advice relating to agriculture, namely, agronomy; consultancy services relating to agriculture; professional consultancy relating to agriculture; information services relating to the use of chemicals, fertilizers and manures used in agriculture; information, advisory and consultancy services relating to all of the aforementioned servicesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 9, 2023DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jan 8, 2023DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 15, 2018ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Mar 9, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 4, 2016FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 16, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 2, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 30, 2016FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 30, 2015MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Apr 30, 2015ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Apr 30, 2015OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Apr 30, 2015OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Feb 13, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 19, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 19, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 11, 2014RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 26, 2013OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Dec 24, 2013OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB—
Dec 24, 2013OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED—
Dec 23, 2013ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Dec 2, 2013GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 26, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 26, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 13, 2013OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 13, 2013OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 6, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 23, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 23, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 22, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 22, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 15, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 1, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 1, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 1, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 1, 2013ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 24, 2013PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jun 10, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 6, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 22, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 1, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 1, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 1, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 1, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 24, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 23, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 9, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 9, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 9, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 15, 2012RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 23, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 23, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 22, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 21, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 20, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 14, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 14, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 13, 2012REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance