Drawing for SMART FACTORY

USPTO serial 79120128

SMART FACTORY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4586371Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 19, 2014
Examiner
PARK, JENNY K
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SMART FACTORY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey H. Greger

Jeffrey H. Greger Lowe Hauptman Ham Berner LLP2318 Mill Rd, Suite 1400Alexandria, VA 22314UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Waste incinerators for industrial purposesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
037Repair or maintenance of waste incinerators for industrial purposes; providing information of repair or maintenance of waste incinerators for industrial purposes; consultancy of repair or maintenance of waste incinerators for industrial purposes; checking, or maintenance of waste incineration facilities for industrial purposes; providing information on checking of and/or maintenance of waste incineration facilities for industrial purposes; and consultancy of checking or maintenance of waste incineration facilities for industrial purposesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
040Operation of waste incineration facilities for industrial purposes; providing information relating to the operation of waste incineration facilities for industrial purposes; consultancy relating to the operation of waste incineration facilities for industrial purposesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 17, 2022DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jul 16, 2022DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 17, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Mar 18, 2022XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Mar 18, 2022XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Nov 5, 2021INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Mar 5, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Feb 13, 2015FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 28, 2015FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 28, 2015FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 19, 2014FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 19, 2014R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 3, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 29, 2014GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 14, 2014OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 14, 2014OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 14, 2014NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 1, 2014OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 29, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 28, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 16, 2014OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 16, 2014OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 9, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 19, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 18, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 18, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 30, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 28, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 27, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 26, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 26, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 14, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 23, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 23, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 23, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 1, 2013RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 6, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 6, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 6, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 5, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 4, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 28, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 28, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 16, 2012REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance