Drawing for S SACRIFICE

USPTO serial 79120178

S SACRIFICE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4468204Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 21, 2014
Examiner
SEVERSON, KAREN
Law office

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with S SACRIFICE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

George D. Dickos

George D. Dickos K&L Gates LLP210 Sixth AvenueK&L Gates CenterPittsburgh, PA 15222-2613

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009[ protective glasses and goggles; prescription and protective spectacles frames; protective helmets; anti-glare visors; protective masks; spectacles cases ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED
018[ sports bags, namely, bags for carrying and/or storing non-motorized scooters; duffel bags; waist packs; wallets; billfolds; wallet chains ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED
028Scooters [ ; wrist guards for athletic use; knee pads and elbow pads for athletic use ]SECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 1, 2022DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Oct 1, 2022DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Dec 19, 2020INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Nov 24, 2020INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Nov 24, 2020INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Nov 12, 2020INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Mar 12, 2020NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
Mar 12, 2020C75PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Mar 10, 2020APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jan 20, 2020ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Jun 27, 2014FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 11, 2014FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jun 9, 2014FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Apr 21, 2014FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 21, 2014R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 30, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Nov 5, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 16, 2013NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Sep 27, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Sep 27, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Sep 16, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Sep 16, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 16, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Sep 16, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Aug 23, 2013NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED
Aug 23, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 23, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 23, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 23, 2013PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Aug 23, 2013PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Jul 2, 2013MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 2, 2013ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 23, 2012RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 4, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Dec 3, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Dec 3, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Dec 1, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Nov 30, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 28, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 28, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Nov 16, 2012REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance