USPTO serial 79120188
S & C
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4386038Status 739Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 20, 2013
- Examiner
- SEVERSON, KAREN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with S & C?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Lazzate (MB), IT
Lazzate (MB), IT
Lazzate (MB), IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew T. Rissler
Andrew T. Rissler Patel & Almeida, P.C.16830 Ventura Blvd., Suite 360Encino, CA 91436UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Metal tools, namely, hand tools in the nature of taps and chasers for cutting; metal tools, namely, hand-operated tools for tapping and threading metal; metal tools, namely, hand-operated cutting tools [ ; metal tools, namely, metal cutting saws and parts thereof, namely, blades for hand saws ] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 2024 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2024 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 16, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 16, 2023 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2022 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2022 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 4, 2018 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2018 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 27, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 24, 2018 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 22, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 22, 2013 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 20, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 20, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 4, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 15, 2013 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 1, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 1, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 29, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 6, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 28, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 20, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 1, 2013 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 7, 2012 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 7, 2012 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 6, 2012 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 5, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2012 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 28, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2012 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |