USPTO serial 79120212
RENDEZ-VOUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROWLEY, SEAN MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RENDEZ-VOUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bruce S. Londa
BRUCE S LONDA NORRIS MCLAUGHLIN & MARCUS PA875 THIRD AVENUENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Wines, sparkling wines, excluding rose wines | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2024 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 17, 2015 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2015 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2015 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2014 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 15, 2014 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 15, 2014 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 2, 2014 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jul 30, 2014 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Jul 30, 2014 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Jul 24, 2014 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jul 19, 2014 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 21, 2014 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2014 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2014 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 1, 2014 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 21, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 16, 2014 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 16, 2014 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 4, 2014 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2014 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2014 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 11, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 11, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 6, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2014 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 6, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 6, 2014 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 19, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 8, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 8, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 8, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 26, 2013 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 9, 2013 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 9, 2013 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 1, 2013 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 31, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 4, 2012 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2012 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |