Drawing for ONESCREEN

USPTO serial 79120423

ONESCREEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4437930Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 26, 2013
Examiner
TURNER, JASON FITZGERALD
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ONESCREEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Arlene D. Hanks

Arlene D. Hanks Moore & Van Allen PLLC3015 Carrington Mill BoulevardSuite 400Morrisville, NC 27560

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Scientific and technological services, namely, research and design in the field of medical image processing; industrial research services in the field of medical image processing; design and development of computer hardware and software; providing non-downloadable computer programs for examination, analysis, transmission, handling, processing and management of images in the field of medical image processing; rental of computer programs; consultancy regarding technical and scientific information, in the fields of computer technology, telecommunications, electronics and medical technologySECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
044Medical services; online medical services; analysis and examination of medical images for medical diagnosis purposes; online analysis and examination of medical images for medical diagnosis purposes; consultancy regarding medical healthcare; x-ray services, namely, consulting in the examination, analysis, transmission, handling, processing and management of medical imaging; technical x-ray technician services, namely, x-ray digital image processing for medical purposes; medical screening, all of the foregoing in the field of medical image processingSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 6, 2022DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Nov 6, 2022DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Dec 12, 2021INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Nov 13, 2021INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Nov 13, 2021INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 26, 2021INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 26, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Nov 26, 2018REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jul 20, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 17, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 21, 2014FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 28, 2014FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 27, 2014FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Feb 26, 2014FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 26, 2013R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 15, 2013GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 10, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 10, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 28, 2013OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 28, 2013OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 21, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 2, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 2, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 19, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 19, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 19, 2013GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 19, 2013GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 19, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 29, 2013GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 29, 2013GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 29, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 6, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 5, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 5, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 24, 2013CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jan 1, 2013RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 7, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 7, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 7, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 6, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 4, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 28, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 28, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 26, 2012LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 22, 2012REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance