Drawing for ENGINEERING ON ANATOMY

USPTO serial 79120506

ENGINEERING ON ANATOMY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
PEREZ, STEVEN M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ENGINEERING ON ANATOMY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Phillip Bennett

Phillip Bennett EIP US LLP2468 Historic Decatur Road, Suite 130San Diego, CA 92106UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software relating exclusively to applications for medical imaged-based analysis, simulation, and design in the field of medical treatment or healthcareSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
040Treatment of materials by additive fabrication technologiesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
042Scientific and technological consultancy services for others, namely, in the technology field of additive fabrication and derived copying; graphic design, namely drawing of 3D drawings for the design of prototypes; analysis of 3D designs; professional reporting by engineers, namely, technical writing for others; computer hardware and software design and development; design, development, adaptation, update and maintenance of software for the production of drilling jigs for surgical and dental applicationsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 29, 2023DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Mar 28, 2023DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Oct 22, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Oct 22, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jul 23, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jun 23, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Mar 20, 2015FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 27, 2015FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Feb 27, 2015FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 8, 2014OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 23, 2014OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Apr 23, 2014OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 27, 2014MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 27, 2014ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 1, 2013GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Aug 1, 2013GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 1, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 4, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 3, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 3, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 24, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 24, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jan 18, 2013RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 3, 2013RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jan 3, 2013RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Dec 28, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Dec 27, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 19, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 4, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Nov 28, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Nov 23, 2012LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED
Nov 22, 2012REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance