USPTO serial 79120506
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Phillip Bennett
Phillip Bennett EIP US LLP2468 Historic Decatur Road, Suite 130San Diego, CA 92106UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software relating exclusively to applications for medical imaged-based analysis, simulation, and design in the field of medical treatment or healthcare | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | Treatment of materials by additive fabrication technologies | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Scientific and technological consultancy services for others, namely, in the technology field of additive fabrication and derived copying; graphic design, namely drawing of 3D drawings for the design of prototypes; analysis of 3D designs; professional reporting by engineers, namely, technical writing for others; computer hardware and software design and development; design, development, adaptation, update and maintenance of software for the production of drilling jigs for surgical and dental applications | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 2023 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2023 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 22, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2015 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 27, 2015 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 27, 2015 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 8, 2014 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 23, 2014 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 23, 2014 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 27, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 27, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 1, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 1, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 4, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 3, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 24, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 24, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2013 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 3, 2013 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 3, 2013 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 28, 2012 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 27, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 4, 2012 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 23, 2012 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2012 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |