USPTO serial 79120603
MULTIONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4441815Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 3, 2013
- Examiner
- STRUCK, ROBERT J
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with MULTIONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel J. Piotrowski
Daniel J. Piotrowski Signify Intellectual Property1 Van de Graaff Drive, Suite 202Burlington, MA 01803United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic controllers and software programs for controlling lighting systems, included in this class; electronic chokes, namely, lighting ballasts; light emitting diodes (LEDS), organic light emitting diodes (OLEDs), laser diodes and zener diodes; optical control apparatus, namely, electrical controller; thermal control apparatus, namely, electrical controller; electronic circuits for light control systems and light management systems; LED modules comprised of integrated LEDs, OLEDs, polymer emitting diodes; starters for fluorescent lights; ballasts for halogen lights, electric capacitors. LED modules comprised of integrated LEDs, OLEDs, polymer emitting diodes for conventional and Solid State lighting purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | [ Electric lighting fixtures, electric lamps, lighting fixtures and lighting installations; lighting fixtures and lighting installations, fitted with LED light sources; lighting installations using LEDs, OLEDs or polymer light emitting diodes (pled) as source of lighting; structural parts of aforesaid goods ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Koninklijke Philips N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Koninklijke Philips N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Signify Holding B.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named MULTIONE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2024 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Feb 22, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 22, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2023 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2022 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2022 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Nov 21, 2020 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Oct 21, 2020 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 21, 2020 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 24, 2020 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 24, 2020 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2020 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 25, 2019 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2019 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Feb 25, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 25, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2018 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 21, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2016 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 13, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2014 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 5, 2014 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 5, 2014 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 3, 2014 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 3, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 23, 2013 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 8, 2013 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Sep 17, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 28, 2013 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 28, 2013 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 28, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 14, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 14, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 22, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 22, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 15, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 15, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 15, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 12, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 9, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 7, 2013 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jan 2, 2013 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 11, 2012 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 11, 2012 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 8, 2012 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 7, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2012 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 28, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2012 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |