Drawing for VANTAGE ONE

USPTO serial 79120775

VANTAGE ONE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KING, LINDA M
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VANTAGE ONE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James P. Hanrath

James P. Hanrath Much Shelist, P.C.191 N. Wacker Drive, Suite 1800Chicago, IL 60606-1615UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Camera lensesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 20, 2023DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Feb 19, 2023DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 3, 2015FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 17, 2014FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 17, 2014FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 16, 2014OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 1, 2014OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 30, 2014OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 17, 2013MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 17, 2013ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 17, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 2, 2013GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 2, 2013GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 2, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 5, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 5, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 5, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 5, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 5, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 2, 2013RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 11, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 11, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 10, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 9, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 4, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 30, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 30, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 29, 2012REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance