Drawing for SRC

USPTO serial 79120837

SRC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MARTIN, CHRISTINE C
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SRC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Furniture casters of metal; sash pulleys; window pulleys; bed casters of metal; runners of metal for sliding doors; fittings of metal for furnitureSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
012Casters for trolleys (vehicles) (carts); mine cart wheels; luggage trucks; shopping trolleys (carts); baby carriagesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
020Furniture casters, not of metal; bed casters, not of metal; furniture fittings, not of metal; bed fittings, not of metalSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 23, 2023DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Apr 22, 2023DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 30, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 19, 2014FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 1, 2014FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 30, 2014FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 16, 2014OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 1, 2014OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 30, 2014OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 30, 2013MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 30, 2013ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 26, 2013RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 1, 2013RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 1, 2013RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 1, 2013RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 31, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 25, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 4, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 30, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 29, 2012REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance