USPTO serial 79120879
LLAMAS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HUSSAIN, TASNEEM
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LLAMAS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Prepared meals, foodstuffs and snacks consisting of principally of meat, poultry, fish, seafood, vegetables, cheese, nuts or salad; snacks derived from cheese or potato products; ingredients for all the aforesaid goods; potato products, french fries, chips and crisps; nut products including edible nuts, prepared nuts, roast nuts, salted nuts; ready to eat snacks consisting primarily of potatoes, potato chips and fabricated potato chips; frozen and chilled foodstuffs; fruits, vegetables, cheese; desserts, chilled desserts, yoghurts and milk-based products | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Prepared savoury foodstuffs made from potato flour and potato starch and in the form of pieces for use as snacks; snack foods and crisps made from cereal preparations, including rice-based crisps, snacks derived from rice products and snacks derived from corn products; pretzels; bagel crisps; crackers; biscuits (sweet and savoury); snack foods made from corn or rice or cereal and in the form of puffs; cream puffs; corn chips, tortilla chips, rice chips, puffed and extruded snacks; sweets; confectionery; chocolate; chocolate-based and chocolate flavoured products; cereals; pastry; bread | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 2022 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2022 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 7, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2016 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jul 24, 2014 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 9, 2014 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 9, 2014 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 16, 2014 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 1, 2014 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 30, 2014 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 9, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 9, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 28, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 2, 2013 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 11, 2012 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 11, 2012 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 11, 2012 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2012 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 7, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 5, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2012 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |