Drawing for RENKEN

USPTO serial 79120964

RENKEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MITTLER, KEVIN A
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RENKEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Oil filters; air cleaners; diesel fuel filters; mufflers for automobile engines; inlet exhaust pipes for mufflers for automobile engines; engine exhaust pipes; fan belts for motors and engines; igniting magnetos for engines; alternators; dynamosSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 24, 2023DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Apr 23, 2023DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 27, 2019CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jan 2, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 19, 2014FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 2, 2014FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 2, 2014FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 16, 2014OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 1, 2014OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 30, 2014OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 3, 2013MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 2, 2013ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 27, 2013RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 4, 2013RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 4, 2013RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 2, 2013RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 1, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 30, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 11, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 5, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 29, 2012REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance