USPTO serial 79121083
SCALED SIZING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARLSON, KRISTIN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SCALED SIZING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stacy L. Emhoff
Stacy L. Emhoff Walker & Jocke231 South BroadwayMedina, OH 44256UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Two-wheeler land vehicles except for automobiles; bicycles; bicycle parts, namely, drive trains, gear wheels, brake shoes; bicycle frames; bicycle steering rods; bicycle parts, namely, handle bar stems; handlebars; handlebar bags, namely, pannier bags adapted for cycles; accessories for handlebars and stems, namely, bicycle bells, bicycle grip tape, bicycle horns; handle bar grips for bicycles; mountain bicycle frames; bicycle saddles; bicycle seat posts and accessories, namely, bicycle saddle covers, bicycle seat cushions; bicycle bells; water bottle holders for bicycles; wheels for two-wheeler; wheel rims; hubs for vehicle wheels; land vehicle parts, namely, two-wheeler axles; spokes for bicycle wheels; gear wheels and gear trains for bicycles; bicycle chains; bicycle pedals; two-wheeler tires; tubeless two-wheeler tires; bicycle pumps; valves for two-wheeler tires; bicycle accessories, namely, bicycle bells, bicycle grip tape, bicycle horns; bicycle parts, namely, disc wheels; bicycle brakes and brake assemblies; gear shift and brake lever adapters for bicycles | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Household and kitchen containers not of precious metal or coated therewith; household and kitchen utensils not of precious metal or coated therewith, namely, aluminum water bottles sold empty, plastic water bottles sold empty, plastic water bottle holders and attached carabineer clip sold as a unit; personal fluid hydration systems comprised of a drinking reservoir made from rubber or plastic; a plastic drinking tube and a plastic mouth piece; water bottles sold empty | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Sporting articles, namely, golf clubs, footballs, boxing gloves; sporting equipment, namely, bicycle gloves and bicycle knee pads | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2022 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 15, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2015 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2014 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2014 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 22, 2014 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 7, 2014 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 7, 2014 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 16, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 3, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 3, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 3, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 8, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 26, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 8, 2013 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 15, 2013 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 15, 2013 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 11, 2013 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 10, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 2, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 2012 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2012 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |