USPTO serial 79121105
BRIGITTE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GLASSER, CARYN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BRIGITTE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Soaps and detergents; cosmetic lotions; eau de Cologne (colognewater); skin lotions; milky lotions; cleansing creams (cosmetic); hand creams; sunscreen creams; foundation cream; lip creams; lipsticks; cheek colors; hair creams; hair spray; hair tonics; hair treatments; hair rinses (shampoo-conditioners); hair pomades; liquid perfumes; eye shadows; tissues impregnated with a skin cleanser (for cosmetic use); deodorants for human beings; nail polish; nail polish removers; bath oils; bath salts; beauty masks; baby oils; baby powder; mascaras; eyebrow pencils; hair bleaches; dentifrices; false nails; false eyelashes | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 021 | Combs; comb cases; cosmetic cream cases; cosmetic utensils; cosmetic utensil sets; make-up sponges; make-up brushes; vanity cases (fitted); perfume sprays (sold empty); powder compacts; soap holders and boxes; toilet cases; nail brushes; powder puffs; tooth brushes (non-electric); tooth brush cases; shaving brushes; shaving brush stands; hair brushes; lip brushes; eyebrow brushes; clothes brushes; Japanese style tea-serving pots; drinking cups; sake cups; dishes and plates; salad bowls; Japanese rice bowls; dish covers; decanters; beer mugs; lunch-boxes; Japanese style soup serving bowls; portable coldboxes (non-electric); drinking flasks (for travellers); piggy banks; flower vases; flower bowls | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 2022 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2022 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 13, 2020 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Aug 8, 2014 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 18, 2014 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 18, 2014 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 22, 2014 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 7, 2014 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 7, 2014 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 18, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 18, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 14, 2013 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 21, 2012 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 20, 2012 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 20, 2012 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 19, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2012 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 11, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2012 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |