Drawing for CMA SYSTEMS

USPTO serial 79121519

CMA SYSTEMS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4557826Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 1, 2014
Examiner
MARTIN, EUGENIA K
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CMA SYSTEMS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles T. J. Weigell

Charles T. J. Weigell FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, P.C.151 WEST 42nd St., 17 Fl.NEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware and software for controlling the operation and running of programs and networks in the field of international transport of goods via truck, train, barge, ship or plane; all of the foregoing goods in the areas of sea transport and logisticsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
016Computer manuals relating to computer hardware, software and computer services, namely, manuals featuring the operation of programs and networks in the field of international transport of goods via truck, train, barge, ship or plane; all of the foregoing goods in the areas of sea transport and logisticsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
037Repair, installation and maintenance of computer hardware and networks in the field of international transport of goods via truck, train, barge, ship or plane; all the foregoing services in the areas of sea transport and logisticsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
038Electronic messaging services; electronic transmission of data and documents via computer terminals in the field of international transport of goods via truck, train, barge, ship or plane; all the foregoing services in the areas of sea transport and logisticsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042Computer services, namely, computer file management, design of customized computer software in the field of international transport of goods via truck, train, barge, ship or plane, and updating of software, rental of software and hardware, computer consultancy, and computer systems integration services; designing, updating and maintaining Web sites on the Internet; consultancy in the field of computers, computer programming services; technical project studies of computer hardware and computer software for maintaining the information system in the field of international transport of goods via truck, train, barge, ship or plane in operational condition and upgraded; all the foregoing services in the areas of sea transport and logisticsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 5, 2023DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Mar 5, 2023DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 24, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Mar 16, 2022INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Mar 16, 2022INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 26, 2021INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Oct 20, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jan 8, 2020CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED—
Dec 10, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 8, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 1, 2019REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
May 23, 2017CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED—
Jan 31, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 23, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 28, 2014FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 27, 2014FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 27, 2014FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 1, 2014FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 1, 2014R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 29, 2014OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 14, 2014OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 14, 2014OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 15, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 15, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 10, 2014GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 26, 2014OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 26, 2014OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 26, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 8, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 7, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 6, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 5, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 5, 2014ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Sep 5, 2013GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Sep 5, 2013GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 5, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 12, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 12, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 5, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 3, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 3, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 3, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 31, 2013RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 7, 2013RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 7, 2013RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 29, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 28, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 21, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 17, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 17, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 13, 2012REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance