Drawing for TRIGUARD

USPTO serial 79121600

TRIGUARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4362932Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 9, 2013
Examiner
DELGIZZI, RONALD ERNEST
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with TRIGUARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kay Lyn Schwartz

Kay Lyn Schwartz Foley & Lardner LLP2021 McKinney Avenue, Suite 1600Dallas, TX 75201UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Automated industrial process control apparatus and systems, namely, automatic electronic process controllers, manual electronic process controllers in the nature of safety control, and computer compatible electronic process controllers, namely, micro-processor based hardware and software used to monitor the status of industrial machinery, namely, turbines, generators and compressors, signal conditioning and communication devices for industrial process control and industrial process control software; electronic analog process control instrumentation, namely, electronic process controllers in the nature of logic based hardware used to monitor the status of industrial machinery, namely, turbines, generators and compressors, micro-processor based hardware and software used to monitor the status of industrial machinery, namely, turbines, generators and compressors, computer control stations, namely, fault tolerant electronic controllers used for safely shutting down automated industrial processes and equipment when operational parameters are exceededACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 30, 2026CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 12, 2023NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Dec 12, 202371AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Dec 6, 2023APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 21, 2023ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Oct 20, 2022RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jul 9, 2022REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 9, 2021CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jan 29, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 29, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 25, 2019ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Oct 15, 2019NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Oct 15, 2019C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Sep 30, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 30, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2019EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Aug 27, 2019PR75POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15—
Aug 7, 2019APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 1, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 9, 2019ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jul 9, 2018REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 27, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 9, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 9, 2013FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 9, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 9, 2013R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 23, 2013GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 23, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 23, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 3, 2013OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 3, 2013OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 3, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 20, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 19, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 7, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 14, 2013RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 13, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 12, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 12, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 18, 2013RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 18, 2013RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 18, 2013RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 17, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 8, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 21, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 17, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 13, 2012REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance