USPTO serial 79121820
ESTERLIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4356043Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 25, 2013
- Examiner
- CAPSHAW, DANIEL
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with ESTERLIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
COOPERATIVE VINICOLE DE MANCY; SOCIETE COOPERATIVE AGRICOLE
EPERNAY, FR
Other trademarks owned by COOPERATIVE VINICOLE DE MANCY; SOCIETE COOPERATIVE AGRICOLE
COOPERATIVE VINICOLE DE MANCY; SOCIETE COOPERATIVE AGRICOLE
F-51200 EPERNAY, FR
Other trademarks owned by COOPERATIVE VINICOLE DE MANCY; SOCIETE COOPERATIVE AGRICOLE
COOPERATIVE VINICOLE DE MANCY; SOCIETE COOPERATIVE AGRICOLE
F-51200 EPERNAY, FR
Other trademarks owned by COOPERATIVE VINICOLE DE MANCY; SOCIETE COOPERATIVE AGRICOLE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas J. Mango
Thomas J. Mango Cantor Colburn LLP20 Church Street22nd FloorHartford, CT 06103Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Wines, sparkling wines, wines of French origin, namely, Champagne | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by COOPERATIVE VINICOLE DE MANCY; SOCIETE COOPERATIVE AGRICOLE
- Other trademarks owned by COOPERATIVE VINICOLE DE MANCY; SOCIETE COOPERATIVE AGRICOLE
- Other trademarks owned by COOPERATIVE VINICOLE DE MANCY; SOCIETE COOPERATIVE AGRICOLE
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named ESTERLIN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2025 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 27, 2024 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2024 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 6, 2023 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2022 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2019 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2019 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 17, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 16, 2019 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 9, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2018 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 21, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 7, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 7, 2013 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 25, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 25, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 2, 2013 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 9, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 20, 2013 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 20, 2013 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 20, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 28, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 28, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2013 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2013 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 26, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 26, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 19, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 16, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 11, 2013 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 23, 2013 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 23, 2013 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 23, 2013 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 22, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 2012 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 13, 2012 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |