Drawing for FILTERCAP

USPTO serial 79121952

FILTERCAP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RICHARDSON, JENNIFER D
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FILTERCAP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Norman P. Soloway

NORMAN P. SOLOWAY, HAYES SOLOWAY P.C.4640 E. SKYLINE DRIVETUSCON, AZ 85718UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Film capacitorsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 24, 2023DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Apr 23, 2023DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 23, 2018ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jan 31, 2016FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 12, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 12, 2016FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 12, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 12, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 16, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 13, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 6, 2014OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 5, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 23, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 22, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 22, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 21, 2014OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 21, 2014OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 28, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 27, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 6, 2014ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 6, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 4, 2014MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 20, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 19, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 23, 2013ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 23, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 23, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 22, 2013MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 27, 2013RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 1, 2013RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 1, 2013RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 31, 2013RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 30, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 23, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 1, 2013MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 28, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 20, 2012REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance