USPTO serial 79122365
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
CE Amsterdam, NL
CE Amsterdam, NL
CE Amsterdam, NL
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jonathan E. Moskin, Katherine P. Califa
Jonathan E. Moskin, Katherine P. Califa FOLEY & LARDNER LLP90 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10016-1314UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | Hotel reservation services for others; holiday accommodation reservation services and resort reservation services, namely, providing hotel room reservation services and resort hotel reservation services and providing online hotel and resort hotel room reservation services; providing information about hotels, hotel accommodations and resorts accommodations, whether or not based on the valuation of customers; information, advice and consultancy relating to the aforesaid services; the aforesaid services also provided electronically | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 4, 2023 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2023 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 2, 2021 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 8, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 8, 2021 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 5, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 5, 2021 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 18, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 6, 2020 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 17, 2020 | RINX | USPTO CORRECTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2019 | CORS | CORRECTION REQUEST SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 4, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 4, 2019 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 1, 2019 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 23, 2019 | ISCO | WITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE - COMM.OFFICE REQUEST | — |
| Jun 14, 2019 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 4, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 15, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 15, 2019 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 15, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2019 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 30, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 8, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 18, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 15, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 15, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 11, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 2, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 29, 2018 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 8, 2018 | PBCO | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - COMM.OFFICE REQUEST | — |
| Dec 21, 2017 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 21, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 18, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 18, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 15, 2017 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2017 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 18, 2016 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jul 1, 2015 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2015 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2015 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 18, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 23, 2015 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2015 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2015 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 10, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 11, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 2014 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2014 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2014 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 20, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2014 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 13, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 13, 2014 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 30, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 30, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 13, 2014 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 28, 2014 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 28, 2014 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 16, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 16, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 17, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 9, 2013 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 18, 2013 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 18, 2013 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 18, 2013 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 17, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 2, 2013 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 27, 2012 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |