USPTO serial 79122798
SUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4737049Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 19, 2015
- Examiner
- MCDOWELL, MATTHEW J
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with SUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mainak H. Mehta
Mainak H. Mehta Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP525 B Street, Suite 2200San Diego, CA 92101United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | [ Loading and unloading machines and apparatus, namely, conveyors; semiconductor manufacturing machines and systems, namely, systems comprised of semiconductor wafer processing machines and filters and purifiers therefor; non-electric prime movers, namely, engines, motors for orientating solar panels, ] linear actuators [, pneumatic linear actuators not for land vehicles, and excluding water mills and wind mills; transmissions for machines; alignment feeding apparatus, namely, mechanized parts feeders for screw conveyors, feeders to supply screws to desktop-type robots in automated factories, mechanized feeders to supply screws to robots and machines as parts of an assembly line ] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2026 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 9, 2025 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2025 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 2, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 31, 2025 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2024 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2022 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Sep 7, 2021 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2021 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 7, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 16, 2021 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2020 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2019 | IRRH | IRREGULARITY FROM IB EXAMINED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 22, 2018 | IRFI | IRREGULARITY ON FINAL DECISION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 30, 2017 | IRRH | IRREGULARITY FROM IB EXAMINED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 18, 2016 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 18, 2016 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 6, 2015 | IRFI | IRREGULARITY ON FINAL DECISION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2015 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2015 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 19, 2015 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 26, 2015 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 19, 2015 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 3, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 27, 2015 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 11, 2015 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 11, 2015 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 11, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 15, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 14, 2015 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 14, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 13, 2015 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2015 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2015 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2015 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2015 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 18, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 15, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 15, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 19, 2014 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 4, 2014 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 4, 2014 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 9, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 8, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 10, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 29, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 5, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 5, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2013 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2013 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2013 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 13, 2013 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 11, 2013 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2013 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |