Drawing for DURAPAC

USPTO serial 79123032

DURAPAC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4468232Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 21, 2014
Examiner
AWRICH,ELLEN
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with DURAPAC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David L. May

David L. May Nixon Peabody LLP799 9th Street, NW, Suite 500WASHINGTON, DC 20001United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Hydraulic tools, namely, hydraulic spreaders for spreading, lifting and levelling works, accessories for hydraulic pullers, namely, hydraulic tri-sectional plates and cross bearing attachments for hydraulic pullers, hydraulic nut splitters, hydraulic cutters, replacement and structural parts and fittings therefor, hydraulic jacks, pneumatic jacks, power operated jacks, power operated nut cutters, torque wrenches, [ punches, ] press frames being parts of machines; [ power operated pipe benders; ] power operated gear pullers; hydraulic pumps; [ power operated crimping tools for cable jointing; power operated web strap pullers; ] power operated cable cutters; [ power operated cable pullers ] [ ; power operated hammer drivers used for rail track maintenance; punching machines for metal working ]ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 15, 2026INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Nov 18, 2025XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Nov 18, 2025XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Jun 18, 2025INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Oct 18, 2024NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Oct 18, 202471AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Sep 9, 2024APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 13, 2023ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jan 21, 2023REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jul 8, 2022RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Mar 4, 2020NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Mar 4, 2020C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Mar 4, 2020APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 4, 2020ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jan 21, 2019REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jul 26, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 27, 2014FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 6, 2014FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 6, 2014FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 21, 2014FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 21, 2014R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 5, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 5, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 16, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 28, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 24, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 19, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 19, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 12, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 12, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 12, 2013GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 12, 2013GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 12, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 28, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 28, 2013NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED—
Aug 28, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 28, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 28, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 28, 2013PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 28, 2013PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 12, 2013MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 12, 2013ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 10, 2013RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 15, 2013RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 15, 2013RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 15, 2013MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 10, 2013RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 9, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 9, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 9, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 8, 2013LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jan 3, 2013REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance