Drawing for CICASTIM

USPTO serial 79123092

CICASTIM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4479322Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 11, 2014
Examiner
ALLEN, SUSAN EILEEN BI
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CICASTIM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Farzad A. Panjshiri

Farzad A. Panjshiri Cantor Colburn LLP20 Church Street22nd FloorHartford, CT 06103

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cosmetic creams for skin careSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 6, 2026INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Mar 6, 2026C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Feb 18, 2026EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Feb 18, 2026TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 18, 2026ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
Feb 18, 2026ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 18, 2026REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 3, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 11, 2023REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Dec 17, 2022RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Aug 29, 2019NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Aug 29, 201971AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Aug 29, 2019APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 2, 2019ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Feb 21, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 20, 2014FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 5, 2014FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 5, 2014FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
May 11, 2014FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 24, 2014LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Feb 17, 2014LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 11, 2014R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 25, 2014GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 26, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 13, 2013OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 13, 2013OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 6, 2013NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 21, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 21, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 30, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 30, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 24, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 23, 2013NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED—
Sep 22, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 22, 2013PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 22, 2013PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 19, 2013LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Jul 26, 2013LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Apr 1, 2013RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 13, 2013RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 13, 2013RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 10, 2013RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 9, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 7, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 15, 2013MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 9, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 8, 2013LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jan 3, 2013REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance