Drawing for WIDMER

USPTO serial 79123104

WIDMER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WIDMER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Cynthia Johnson Walden

Cynthia Johnson Walden Fish & Richardson P.C.P.O. Box 1022Minneapolis, MN 55440-1022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cosmetic preparations, namely, face creams, cleansers, fresheners and lotions; hand and body creams and lotions; hair shampoos and lotions; tinted moisturizing creams; toilet soaps; personal deodorants; skin cleansing gels for use in the bath and showerSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
005Dermatological preparations for the treatment of acne, seborrhoea and psoriasis of the scalp, seborrhoeic dermatitis, hyperkeratosis, hyperpigmentation, keloids and herpes simplexSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 16, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Apr 15, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 10, 2015FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 20, 2015FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 20, 2015FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 19, 2014OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 4, 2014OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 4, 2014OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 20, 2014MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 20, 2014ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 22, 2013GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 22, 2013GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 22, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 1, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 31, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 31, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 31, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 31, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 31, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 24, 2013RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 1, 2013RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 1, 2013RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 1, 2013RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 31, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 25, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 15, 2013MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 9, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 7, 2013LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jan 3, 2013SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance