USPTO serial 79123146
MICROFLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4460506Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 7, 2014
- Examiner
- RINKER, ANTHONY MICHAEL
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with MICROFLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
H David Starr
H David Starr Muncy, Geissler, Olds & Lowe, P.C.125 S. Royal StreetAlexandria, VA 22314UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines, apparatus and installations, namely, power drills, cutting machines, [ industrial printing machines, ] engraving machines, laser engraving machines [, and sintering machines ] for the treatment of materials with the aid of microtechnology and nanotechnology, in particular laser microtechnology and nanotechnology, in particular for the treatment of flat, flexible materials, all of the aforesaid goods being preferably for drilling, cutting, removing, structuring, engraving, marking, printing, coating, drying and sintering of materials, in particular in the MEMS (microelectromechanical systems) industry, the electronic industry, the semiconductor industry, the battery industry, the photovoltaic industry, in medical technology and solar technology; parts for all the aforesaid goods, included in this class | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2025 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 11, 2025 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 11, 2025 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 23, 2025 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 23, 2024 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2024 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 20, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 25, 2023 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2023 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2022 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Dec 18, 2019 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2019 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 17, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 12, 2019 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2019 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2014 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 5, 2014 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 5, 2014 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 7, 2014 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 7, 2014 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 22, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 21, 2013 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 2, 2013 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 2, 2013 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 2, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 13, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 4, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 3, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 25, 2013 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 4, 2013 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 4, 2013 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 2, 2013 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 1, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 17, 2013 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2013 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |