Drawing for RECUVANE

USPTO serial 79123197

RECUVANE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4535189Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 27, 2014
Examiner
LAMOTHE, LESLEY
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with RECUVANE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Marcus P. Dolce

Marcus P. Dolce Flynn Thiel, P.C.2026 Rambling RoadKalamazoo, MI 49008-1631UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007[ Machines and equipment for solid-liquid separation via filtration and mechanical pressing, namely, belt presses; ] centrifugal decanters for draining, clarifying, separating, sorting of mixtures of multiple substances, including solid-liquid mixtures, liquid-liquid mixtures, solid-solid mixtures, solid-solid-liquid mixtures, solid-liquid-liquid mixtures; centrifugal separatorsACTIVE—
009[ Electronic control units for centrifugal drive assemblies in centrifugal decanters and centrifugal separators ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
011[ Conduits and pipes used for separating or clarifying machines; filtering units for use in filtering and removing the components in mixtures of solids and liquids, mixtures of solids, mixtures of liquids and for removing liquids from solids in suspensions ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
037[ Building, installation, servicing, maintenance and repair of machinery and equipment used with clarifying machines and centrifugal separators ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042[ Development of new devices for use in separating or clarifying machines and systems; technological consultancy in the field of separation technology ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 18, 2024INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Oct 17, 2024INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jul 23, 2024INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jul 23, 2024INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jun 18, 2024INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 15, 2024NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Feb 15, 202471AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Feb 14, 2024ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
May 27, 2023REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Mar 20, 2023FINPFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 19, 2022XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Dec 19, 2022INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
Dec 19, 2022XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Aug 15, 2022RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
May 9, 2022FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 27, 2021INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Aug 21, 2021GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 23, 2021RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 27, 2021NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jan 27, 2021C75PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Dec 7, 2020APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 18, 2020ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
May 27, 2019REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Apr 18, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 13, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 2014FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 1, 2014FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 1, 2014FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 27, 2014FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 27, 2014R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 11, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 11, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 6, 2014GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 19, 2014OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 19, 2014OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 19, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 6, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 4, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 31, 2014XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 31, 2014GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 31, 2014GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 31, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 30, 2013GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 30, 2013GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 30, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 6, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 6, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 24, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 23, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 15, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 15, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 14, 2013RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 24, 2013RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 24, 2013RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 24, 2013RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 23, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 18, 2013MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 17, 2013RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW—
Jan 16, 2013RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 15, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 14, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 14, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 10, 2013REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance