Drawing for P PICOPULSE

USPTO serial 79123276

P PICOPULSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AYALA, LOURDES
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with P PICOPULSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Maureen C. Kassner

MAUREEN C KASSNER PANITCH SCHWARZE BELISARIO & NADEL LLP2005 MARKET STSTE 2200PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-7086

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computers, computer hardware; modems; communication interface cards for data processing equipment in the form of printed circuits; interfaces for computers being communication interface modules for the exchange of data; electronic data converters for data recorded on computer media; chips, namely, integrated circuits; electronic computer chips, namely, contactless interface chips, semiconductor chips, and silicon chips; microcircuits for coding and decoding data; printed circuits; semiconductors; central processing units; microprocessors; microcontrollers; electronic tags, namely, tags for controlling access, management of stock, traceability of goods, and protection against theft; chip cards, namely, blank electronic chip cards; encoded electronic chip cards containing programming for reading, writing, controlling, exchanging and modification of data for use in the field of payment, finance, access, control, transport, ticketing, electronic identification, retail and gift card and mobile communication fields for use with smart cards, key fobs, mobile phones, handheld consumer electronic devices, point of sale displays and PC peripherals; memory cards for electronic audio and video devices, mobile phones, computers, players, and movie and still camerasABANDONED—
042engineering services; computer programming; computer program design; design of programs for computers and microprocessors; microprocessor programming; design, development, and scientific technical studies of computer systems; design and development of electronic security modules; design, development and engineering services of new products for others; design and development of computer equipment, computer programs, integrated circuits, microcontrollers, and computer chips; design of programs for computers and microprocessors; microprocessor programming; computer programming services; design, development and scientific technical studies of computer systems; design, development and scientific technical studies of data exchange computer systems in the field of tactile technology; technical support in the field of data communication, namely, troubleshooting in the nature of diagnosing computer hardware and software problems; remote monitoring services for computer systems to ensure proper functioning; design, development, customization and updating of software and computer programs; design, development, customization and scientific technical studies of smart cards and electronic cards, integrated circuit cards, microcircuit cards, magnetic cards, memory cards, and contactless cards; research and development of new products for others; information, advisory and consultancy services in the field of computing; development of contact-free solutions in the field of communications and telecommunications, namely, development of new products for others for very short-distance radio communication and/or near-field communicationsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 23, 2023DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
May 22, 2023DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
May 21, 2023DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Dec 27, 2019ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jun 23, 2016FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 6, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 5, 2016FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 5, 2015MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jun 5, 2015ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jun 5, 2015OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jun 5, 2015OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Feb 5, 2015ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Dec 19, 2014RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 3, 2014OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Nov 21, 2014OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB—
Nov 21, 2014OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED—
Jun 27, 2014OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 26, 2014ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jun 11, 2014OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 11, 2014OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 27, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 27, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 23, 2014GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 7, 2014OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 7, 2014OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 7, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 18, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 17, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 17, 2014XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 17, 2014GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 17, 2014GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 17, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 10, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 10, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 10, 2014ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Oct 15, 2013GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 15, 2013GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 15, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 17, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 17, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 11, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 6, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 6, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 6, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 25, 2013RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 7, 2013RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 7, 2013RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 7, 2013RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 6, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 26, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 18, 2013MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 14, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 10, 2013REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance