USPTO serial 79123342
FAMILY HOUSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALLEN, SUSAN EILEEN BI
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FAMILY HOUSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2023 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2023 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 26, 2018 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Mar 26, 2015 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Oct 17, 2014 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 30, 2014 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 30, 2014 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 27, 2014 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 11, 2014 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 11, 2014 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 29, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 30, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 5, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2013 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 4, 2013 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 4, 2013 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 2, 2013 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 1, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 18, 2013 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2013 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |