USPTO serial 79123674
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stewart J. Bellus
Stewart J. Bellus Collard & Roe, P.C.1077 Northern Blvd.Roslyn, NY 11576UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Pharmaceutical and veterinary products containing extracts from medicinal plants for use in the treatment of gastrointestinal tract disorders; dietetic foods, namely, bread, biscuits, pasta, crackers, bars, yogurt, tea, fruit juice, soft drinks and water containing extracts from medicinal plants for use in the treatment of gastrointestinal tract disorders | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2022 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 4, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2020 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 5, 2020 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 22, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 16, 2019 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2019 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 14, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 14, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 22, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 22, 2013 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 20, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 28, 2013 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 20, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 4, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 15, 2013 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 28, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 27, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 17, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 16, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 16, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 7, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 6, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 27, 2013 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 4, 2013 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 4, 2013 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 2, 2013 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 1, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 29, 2013 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2013 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2013 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |