Drawing for ULTRA STAR

USPTO serial 79123694

ULTRA STAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4472987Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 28, 2014
Examiner
ALLEN, SUSAN EILEEN BI
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ULTRA STAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Leo M. Loughlin

LEO M. LOUGHLIN ROTHWELL, FIGG, ERNST & MANBECK, PC607 14TH ST NW STE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20005-2005UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006METAL PIPES; FLEXIBLE METAL PIPES; TUBE SOCKETS IN THE NATURE OF METAL PIPE FITTINGS; PIPE UNIONS OF METAL; METAL CONNECTIONS AND METAL JOINTS FOR PIPES; TUBES OF METAL, HYDRAULIC CONNECTORS, NAMELY, METAL PIPES, OTHER THAN PARTS OF VEHICLES, MACHINES OR MOTORS; FLANGES OF METAL, NAMELY, METAL PIPE COLLARS; METAL ADAPTORS FOR PLASTIC PIPES, BEING OTHER THAN PARTS OF MACHINES OR SANITARY INSTALLATIONS; METAL RING-NUTS, METAL SAFES, METAL ORESSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
017FLEXIBLE PIPES, NOT OF METAL, FOR USE IN HYDRAULIC APPLICATIONS; REINFORCED RUBBER PIPES, PLASTIC FLEXIBLE PIPES AND HOSES FOR HYDRAULIC APPARATUS AND FLUID CONVEYING APPLICATIONS, NON-METALLIC HYDRAULIC HOSES MADE OF RUBBER, OTHER THAN PARTS OF VEHICLES HYDRAULIC SYSTEMS; REINFORCED RUBBER AND PLASTIC HYDRAULIC HOSES, REINFORCED RUBBER HOSES AND RUBBER TUBES FOR HYDRAULIC APPLIANCES AND FLUID CONVEYING APPLICATIONS; RUBBER TUBES AND HOSES FOR USE IN THE FIELD OF HYDRAULICS; NON METALLIC PIPE UNIONS FOR USE WITH FLEXIBLE RUBBER PIPESSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 21, 2023DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
May 21, 2023DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
May 29, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Apr 5, 2022INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Apr 5, 2022INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Oct 26, 2021INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Feb 26, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
May 1, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jul 4, 2014FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 17, 2014FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jun 17, 2014FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Apr 28, 2014FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 28, 2014R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 12, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 23, 2013NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Oct 8, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Oct 7, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Sep 24, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 7, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 6, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 6, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Sep 6, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 6, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 25, 2013RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 7, 2013RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Mar 7, 2013RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Mar 7, 2013RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Mar 6, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 26, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 29, 2013MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Jan 24, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jan 17, 2013REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance